In a recent decision the Employment Appeal Tribunal addressed the matter of whether disciplinary processes must be put on hold pending the outcome of grievances raised at the same time as disciplinary matters.
For background information, in the case of Jinadu v Docklands Buses, the employee bus driver was dismissed for gross misconduct because she refused to comply with her employer’s (repeated) requests that she attend training and assessment pursuant to recent complaints about her driving standards.
Disciplinary investigations commenced and subsequently, Ms Jinadu raised various grievances relating to discrimination and pay. As a result of the disciplinary enquiries, Ms Jinadu was dismissed for poor performance.
The case was first heard in the Employment Tribunal, which made a clear finding that there had not been an unfair dismissal. However, the employee was given permission to appeal and on appeal, a number of other issues were raised, including whether or not the disciplinary matters should have been suspended pending the outcome of the grievance.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal Judge utterly rejected the proposition that the disciplinary process should have been put on hold pending the outcome of the grievance. This decision would seem to pave the way for employers to allow disciplinary processes, and even dismissals, to run at the same time as grievance procedures. However, as is always the case with difficult people management cases, it is advisable to ensure that disciplinary processes follow those set out in employment contracts or manuals, ensuring that the disciplinary procedure invoked cannot give rise to additional claims by the employee.
We will be hosting a series of webinars in July on ‘Managing Difficult Employees’ – find out more and how to register.
Our legal consultants at Lawspeed can help you with difficult employment relationships and offer advice on disciplinary and grievance processes. Please contact us on 01273 236 236 should you require any assistance in these matters.
Adrian, a highly experienced lawyer, founded Lawspeed in 1997. He is responsible for developing our extensive portfolio of products and services, including the widely used Lawspeed contract templates. Adrian is an expert on “recruitment law” and specialises in contracts, regulatory compliance, employment status and dispute handling. He is chair of the trade body the Association of Recruitment Consultancies, the only lawyer lead recruitment trade body in the UK. Adrian and his co-director Ravi devised Standards in Recruitment as a vehicle for helping drive up standards and compliance in the industry.
Adrian is our lead in discussions with the government over regulatory evolution. Apart from assisting with client support, Adrian’s primary role is research and development into methods of business delivery, our latest service Proterms being his most recent project. Adrian heads our IR35 lawyers team.