A recent case serves as a reminder that you cannot appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (‘EAT’) against a decision of an Employment Tribunal, unless it is on a point of law only. The EAT will not hear an appeal which relates to a disputed fact in a case.
In this case, an employee who had brought a sex discrimination claim against her employers, alleging that they had not offered her a new post because some members of the interview panel knew she was pregnant. The Employment Tribunal, faced with conflicting evidence, had ruled in her employer’s favour and dismissed the sex discrimination claim. The employee appealed but the EAT said no point of law was involved; the ruling by the Employment Tribunal was based on the question of whether any of the interview panel members knew that she was pregnant and this was simply a matter of fact for decision by the Employment Tribunal.
Adrian, a highly experienced lawyer, founded Lawspeed in 1997. He is responsible for developing our extensive portfolio of products and services, including the widely used Lawspeed contract templates. Adrian is an expert on “recruitment law” and specialises in contracts, regulatory compliance, employment status and dispute handling. He is chair of the trade body the Association of Recruitment Consultancies, the only lawyer lead recruitment trade body in the UK. Adrian and his co-director Ravi devised Standards in Recruitment as a vehicle for helping drive up standards and compliance in the industry.
Adrian is our lead in discussions with the government over regulatory evolution. Apart from assisting with client support, Adrian’s primary role is research and development into methods of business delivery, our latest service Proterms being his most recent project. Adrian heads our IR35 lawyers team.